ON TV & RADIO

Video Player

In the Press

News Online

THE BLOG

Features and more…

At the United Nations

After speaking twice at the UN, once in Geneva & once in New York this statement from the UN puts very well the position of unfairness on women in women’s sport by including males.

The UN‑linked study (2024) reported that more than 600 female athletes that we know of, across 29 sports had lost out to trans‑identifying competitors, with nearly 900 medals going to those athletes. It will be far more by now.

The report from the UN also noted that some women withdrew from competition entirely, either because they felt they could not win against biologically male competitors or because they objected to the fairness of the rules. I have seen this myself many times. Women & girls self exclude. The same applies to single sex changing rooms & classes, that allow males in.

High‑profile examples include US high school athletics: where female runners testified that they stopped entering events when trans competitors dominated sprint categories. In martial arts and contact sports there have been cases where women declined to fight trans women opponents, citing safety concerns. In swimming and cycling female athletes have said they considered quitting when trans women were admitted into their categories.

Read the Full Report Here

The wider impact is female opportunities are lost. It’s not only about medals. In sport it’s qualifying places, scholarships, sponsorships, and high profile visibility that’s tied to competition results and financial rewards. Losing a spot can mean losing a whole career path.

There is also a Psychological effect. Even if the number of trans women competing is small, the perception that categories are no longer fair can discourage participation.

This is why federations like World Aquatics and World Athletics have now barred trans identifying males who went through male puberty from female categories. But all males regardless retain a physical advantage over their female rivals. So I prefer a protected sex screened female category & an open & inclusive category. Fair & easy to apply.

Their stated aim is obviously to protect the opportunity to compete for women as a class.

This should never be a contentious position. Allowing biological females a level playing field free from all males in sports that are sex segregated is not an unreasonable assumption or position to take. It’s one we at the WSU intend to defend.

Publications

TIMES AND DAILY TELEGRAPH BOOK OF THE YEAR

SHORTLISTED FOR THE SPORTS BOOK AWARDS 2024

Sharron Davies is no stranger to battling the routine sexism of the sporting world. She missed out on Olympic Gold because of doping among East German athletes in the 1980s; now, biological males are being allowed to compete directly against women under the guise of trans ‘self-ID’.

This callous indifference towards women in sport, argue Sharron and journalist Craig Lord, is merely the latest stage in a decades-long history of sexism on the part of sport’s higher-ups.Unfair Play provides the facts, science and arguments that will help women in sport get the justice they deserve.

‘A compelling account of how women in sport continue to be subjugated’ Daily Mail

WE’RE ON X

Follow our Posts @wsusportsunion

Why do mens road 10K times qualify for Bham 2026 but not women? The men have pacers in these races so what’s the difference?

Track 10,000m races are becoming extinct like the dinosaurs. So why restrict women to “women-only” races while men have 100s of chances in mixed races?

Load More